Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Russiagate, For Your Eyes Only

Only two issues in today's collection. First, Ambassador Douche Darroch. I didn't think much of when it was revealed he called Trump some bad words. I'm sure ambassadors talk shit about the people they are sent to cover, as well as their own countrymen all the time. People do that. I assumed that it was just part of the upcoming takeover of the Brits by the Brexit crowd, leaking to get him fired, and it worked. But now, Sara Carter reveals that the British Ambassador Who Resigned Vouched For Christopher Steele as ‘Absolutely Legit’
Kim Darroch reportedly told a U.S. official that Christopher Steele, the author of the discredited anti-Trump dossier that the FBI used to justify secretly monitoring members of the Trump team, was “absolutely legit.” Steele, in producing the dossier and several of its false or unsubstantiated claims, was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee.

The leaked diplomatic documents were published by the The Mail on Sunday, days after the paper published several anti-Trump messages Darroch sent to Downing Street from 2017 to present.
And from Tom Rogan, WaEx,  Ousted UK ambassador leaked US intelligence
According to one current and one former U.S. government official speaking on the condition of anonymity, Darroch repeatedly leaked classified U.S. intelligence information, including highly classified information, to a journalist for a U.S.-based media outlet. The sources are consolidated by the reaction my related inquiries have received from other government officials.

These leaks are unrelated to the diplomatic cables which sparked Trump's anger and Darroch's departure.

Still, one source says that the U.S. government was so alarmed by Darroch's leaks that it launched an official investigation to find the source of the information. That source described the leaked intelligence as “very sensitive,” and suggested that exigent U.S. security concerns motivated the investigation. That source says that non-U.S. government derived records showed the ambassador and journalist exchanging messages on a continuing basis. The source emphasized that these communications were not derived from U.S. government actions.

A second source, a career government official, described the leaks as "unprecedented."
Ace comments, I'd like to pass along an invitation to the Saudi embassy in Turkey. I hear the meat plate is stunning.

There's good evidence that people in the British government were playing along with the Brennan/Clapper/Comey axis in trying to rig the election against Trump. I think we have just identified one of them. Maybe Boris Johnson will extradite him to Gitmo for some "special" questioning.

And from Sundance at CTH, Lawsuit Claims Julian Assange Confirmed DNC Emails Received From Seth Rich – Not a Russian Hack…
A rather stunning report from Gateway Pundit outlines information contained within a lawsuit filing. The lawsuit, filed by Businessman Ed Butowsky, alleges Wikileaks founder Julian Assange confirmed to Fox News analyst Ellen Ratner that the DNC leaked emails were received from Seth Rich and his brother Aaron.

The details contained within the lawsuit filing (full pdf below) are stunning.

If this information is true and accurate, the DOJ claim of a Russian hack –based on assertions by DNC contractor, Crowdstrike– would be entirely false. Additionally the DC murder of Seth Rich would hold a far more alarming motive.

Here’s the Full Court Filing:
Robbin Young with Roger Moore in "For Your Eyes Only"
In even more colorful prose, 100%FedUp writes, BREAKING WIKILEAKS BOMBSHELL! Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Was DNC LEAKER: “He Was My Whistleblower”
Wikileaks just confirmed murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was the source of the DNC leak.

Wikileaks released a series direct messages from US alleged “Russian spy” Guccifer 2.0 to actress model Robbin Young (NSFW link) (according to Young).

In the stream of texts the discussion leads to the DNC leaker.

His name is “Seth”…

** In November Julian Assange said Russia did not hack into the DNC servers. -h/t GP
Here’s the proof:
The fact that it's cited in a law suit doesn't make it true. But it does suggest the evidence is strong enough not to be too embarrassing to the lawyer submitting it.

The Wombat has Rule 5 Sunday: Kathy Zhu and FMJRA 2.0: Floating up and running on time and within budget.

No comments:

Post a Comment