So the DoJ just sent out letters to “sanctuary” cities and it wasn’t fan mail
Up until now, all of the talk of cutting off federal funding to renegade “sanctuary cities” or states which don’t enforce the law has been mostly that… just talk. It’s been enough to spur quite a bit of action in response, both positive and negative, but for the most part we’ve only been hearing debates in the media rather than substantive policy changes in Washington. Could this be the first step in making it more official? Jeff Sessions and the Department of Justice fired of letters to a number of jurisdictions reminding them that they need to take certain steps to show that they are in compliance with the law if they want to receive the rest of their expected DoJ funding. (justice.gov)It's no secret that a large part of Trump's appeal was his willingness to call a spade a spade on illegal immigration. The more the sanctuary cities (and states, in California's case) resist, the more solid his support outside the blue archipelagos will grow.
Today, the Department of Justice sent the attached letters to nine jurisdictions which were identified in a May 2016 report by the Department of Justice’s Inspector General as having laws that potentially violate 8 U.S.C. § 1373…You can read the full letter here but what they’re talking about is an agreement signed on to by all such grant money recipients in which they are required to uphold the applicable portions of 8 U.S.C. § 1373. The specific sticking point will likely be this section:
The letters remind the recipient jurisdictions that, as a condition for receiving certain financial year 2016 funding from the Department of Justice, each of these jurisdictions agreed to provide documentation and an opinion from legal counsel validating that they are in compliance with Section 1373. The Department of Justice expects each of these jurisdictions to comply with this grant condition and to submit all documentation to the Office of Justice Programs by June 30, 2017, the deadline imposed by the grant agreement.
Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual.That one’s not particularly subtle, is it? But it’s also not controversial in any way. It’s just the law, and the various levels of government are all supposed to be on the same page in terms of enforcing it.
Also: Trump signs executive order tightening rules on H1B visa program for highly skilled foreign workers