Latest Snowflake Outrage: Wonder Woman Has No Armpit Hair
|Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman|
You can't do anything these days without getting the progressives all bent out of shape. You can't even make a movie about an Amazonian warrior princess who can hold her own with the likes of Superman and Batman without wounding the feelings of a modern feminist, because something about that warrior princess will still not be "progressive" enough.
So what's "progressive?"
For example: Wonder Woman has shaved her armpits, and THAT IS NOT OK:
Twitter exploded at the revelation, claiming women of the fictional matriarchy Themyscira would probably not shave their armpits. Some speculated that Gadot’s armpits were photoshopped to show a sheen, immaculate visage, unattainable by real women.
|Not here either!|
Not shaving armpit hair? I guess I'm progressive, and didn't know it!
Many woke, intersectional journalists were also angered by the lack of gross armpit hair.
“Is this seriously still happening in 2017,” cried Slate.
“Do better!" crowed the Revelist.
Refinery29 even pined for a day when Wonder Woman could “prove that women -- even those who are superheroes -- don’t have to cater to beauty standards that are meant to make them more attractive to men.”
|Definitely not here!|
Actually, I think most female ideals are of female creation. A way to compete for mates.
Seriously, this is the WORST THING IN THE WORLD.
And that's very illustrative of what they are still trying to call "feminist" these days. If whether or not a fictional superhero is a feminist if she shaves her armpits apparently has something to do with the quality of a woman's life in the West, then THE ACTUAL QUALITY OF LIFE FOR WOMEN IN THE WEST IS AWESOME.
Um,you do know that Wonder Woman is a fictional character, right?
Wombat-socho was a day late with "Late Night With Rule 5 Monday"
Post a Comment