Wednesday, November 23, 2011

ClimateGate 2.0 is Here

A new batch of emails from the climate scientists pushing the hard version of anthropogenic global warming (and by extension the regulation of our energy economy) to death have been released. A few excerpts and links to the complete set of documents are available over at Watts Up With That.  The culprit is either a very clever hacker, or a traitorous insider with access to their computers.  As much of this material had been subject to FOIA.  The excerpts so far are not smoking guns for out and out scientific fraud but certainly suggest a lack of objectivity (an ideal in science rarely achieved, I might add), and a willingness to attempt dirty tricks to discredit opponents (one might say they've been hoist on their own petard).

<3373> Bradley: I’m sure you agree–the Mann/Jones GRL paper was truly pathetic and should never have been published. I don’t want to be associated with that 2000 year

<3115> Mann: By the way, when is Tom C going to formally publish his roughly 1500 year  reconstruction??? It would help the cause to be able to refer to that
reconstruction as confirming Mann and Jones, etc.

<3940> Mann: They will (see below) allow us to provide some discussion of the synthetic
example, referring to the J. Cimate paper (which should be finally accepted upon submission of the revised final draft), so that should help the cause a bit.

<0810> Mann: I gave up on Judith Curry a while ago. I don’t know what she think’s she’s
doing, but its not helping the cause...

<2440> Jones: I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the

<2094> Briffa: UEA does not hold the very vast majority of mine [potentially FOIable emails] anyway which I copied onto private storage after the completion of the IPCC
<1680> Mann: ...I would not respond to this. They will misrepresent and take out of context anything you give them. This is a set up. They will certainly publish this, and will ignore any evidence to the contrary that you provide. s They are going after Wei-Chyung because he’s U.S. and there is a higher threshold for establishing libel. Nonetheless, he should consider filing a defamation lawsuit, perhaps you too.

I have been talking w/ folks in the states about finding an investigative journalist to investigate and expose McIntyre, and his thus far unexplored connections with fossil fuel interests.Perhaps the same needs to be done w/ this Keenan guy.

No comments:

Post a Comment