And Kenin Spivak at Real Clear Wire has a Report Card on Trump’s First ‘100’ Days "In sum, Trump has made extraordinary progress. If he stays on this policy path and makes a few adjustments in messaging and implementation, the administration ultimately will prevail against most legal challenges, and Trump will be one of the most consequential presidents in U.S. history." 100 days? It hasn't even been a full month. At Da Wire they're trying Keeping Up With Trump: Here’s Everything He Did Week Four. Jarrett Stepman at Da Signal, Trump’s Dark New Deal. "Trump and his team have brought vigor and competence to a White House that seemed to have been missing for a long, long time. Even when they make mistakes, they own up to them and carry on." KT at Ace's wants to know What has surprised you (and others) most about Trump 2? Althouse compares Trump to JFK, "[John F.] Kennedy concluded that, if outright confrontation failed, then circumvention of the process must be relied on..." "... executive orders instead of legislation, extensions of authority for the team players, isolation of the less responsive parts of government. Let the uncooperative agencies atrophy, while a few vigorous men took on more and more general tasks…. More important is the extent to which he viewed his own administration as a raid of mobile 'outsiders' on the settled government of America. . . "
At NYPo, Douglas Murray says Trump wants peace and an end to the war in Ukraine – it’s by far his toughest objective. CA Skeet at PJM wonders Could Trump Actually Pull It Off?, Gaza, that is. It might be tougher than Ukraine. Breitbart reports Trump Establishes National Energy Dominance Council Led by Secretaries Burgum, Wright. Real Clear Energy explains How Alaska Can Seize the Opportunity of a Trump Presidency. At WUWT, World Becomes Brighter as Trump Reverses Biden’s Incandescent Light Bulb Ban. ET hears a Judge Declines to Halt Trump’s Firing of Inspectors General, "The fired inspectors general were forced to drop a request for a temporary restraining order." NYPo, DHS moves to fire 12 CISA employees who policed ‘misinformation’ and pause ‘all election security activities’. At Da Caller, Trump Using His Pen To Obliterate Gender-Cult Insanity For Good and Intel Agencies Begin Dismantling DEI In Response To Trump’s Order. At Twitchy, This is it Boys! This is WAR! Leftwing Activist Declares Civil War on MAGA and it is HILARIOUS. Molly Ploofkins @Mollyploofkins, "A Civil War against MAGA is coming."
Insty,
IT’S COME TO THIS:
Watch: Unhinged Chiefs Fan Blames Trump for Eagles’ Victory, and I Can’t Stop Laughing. Sarah Arnold at TownHall, hears
Every Show Cancelled at the Kennedy Center in Protest of Trump. Great! More cost savings. Fire the staff and shutter the joint. Why does DC get a federally funded venue? Nick Arama at RedState want you to
WATCH Maddow's Weaselly Response to Being Wrong on Elon and US Gov't Buying Teslas.
At Da Blaze,
Thin-skinned German minister melts down over Vance's speech: 'Not acceptable'. Matt Taibbi at Racket sends "A note to the foreign minister",
Germany Opens Big Fat Pie Hole.
Victor Davis Hanson @VDHanson, "
Snarky Europeans Scowl At Truth-teller Vance. Europeans sat aghast after Vice-President J.D. Vance dared to suggest that their socialist democracies have become illiberal, intolerant, authoritarian—and on the wrong side of global populism. Like some addict that knows his habit is killing him, and yet who cannot resist another fix, so the Euros war on fossil fuels and hollow out their middle classes. . . "
Jonathan Turley @JonathanTurley, "
Vance's speech was truly Churchillian-no less than the famous Iron Curtain speech daring the West to confront the danger of communism. Roughly 80 years later, Vance called allies to account for the growing threat not from foreign adversaries but themselves."
wretchardthecat @wretchardthecat, "
JD Vance's denunciation of the demise of conscience speech in Europe is devastating because the secular establishment denies such a thing is even possible, or ridicules its existence (except for Islam) and have left the field open to speakers like Vance to rampage through."
Kurt Schlichter @KurtSchlichter, "
Apologize for telling them that they shouldn’t arrest people for silently praying? That’s your position?" Quote Chrissy Houlahan@RepHoulahan, "I’m struggling for the words to describe my disappointment with Vice President Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference. I feel as though all of Europe and half of America deserve an apology. VP Vance chided and derided Europe for the very things that our great nation
Show more" Lois McLatchie Miller at Spec World says
Vance is right — Britain really has ‘thoughts-and-prayers’ policing. "As America recommits to fundamental freedoms, the cultural chasm with Europe has never more visible." From Twitchy,
Mollie Hemingway and Others Sink NYT Journo's Attempt to Make JD Vance a Censorship Hypocrite.
The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee, "Europeans Beg JD Vance To Become President Of Europe
https://buff.ly/4k0D8gV"
Matt Margolis at PJM explains
Sorry Libs, DOGE Was Barack Obama's Idea. Hat Hair,
That Was (D)ifferent, Yo: 'We Don't Need to Wait for Congress to Cut Wasteful Spending'.
PathfinderInitiative @tpfinitiative "Obama himself stated he didn’t need Congress to cut wasteful government spending. So don’t waste my time with your pathetic lies; here’s the clip for all to see. Now watch as your foolish argument withers and dies in the face of cold, undeniable truth."
John Ringo SF Author @Jringo1508 "
I keep pointing this out to people. Pointing it out again. Obama created DOGE to solidify his control of the Federal Government no matter who was POTUS. Trump and Musk just hacked it. Never pass something you don't want used against you." Quote, "Victor Bigham @Ravious101 "Replying to @elonmusk "THIS is such a good story, I had to copy and paste it here for y'all. I came across a lawyer, Tom Renz, who actually read Trump's DOGE Executive Order and, expecting some illegal power grab, found it to be airtight. Turns out Trump and Musk didn't create anything. Obama did.
Show more" Sundance reports
Musk Sends Termination Notice to Dozen Workers at U.S. Digital Services Office, The Preexisting Agency DOGE Replaced. Breitbart,
Exclusive: Sen. Joni Ernst Gives the Inside Story on How DOGE Was ‘Ready to Go’ in Cutting $2 Trillion in Waste. Madeline Leesman at TownHall,
Here Are the Top DOGE Takedowns So Far. Althouse wonders
Do the American people feel outraged when federal workers lose their job?. "Or are we happy to see all this vigorous economizing? I keep seeing articles that seem to assume that it's a good issue for Democrats: How terrible that humble workers are getting fired! Is that the public opinion, or do people think the federal government is over-inflated and not terribly beneficial? Trump got elected for a reason. What's the evidence that people want to see a preservation of the status quo? The latest article I'm reading is
"Records show how DOGE planned Trump’s DEI purge — and who gets fired next/A DOGE team plans to fire federal workers who are not in DEI roles and employees in offices that protect equal rights, internal documents show" (WaPo)(free-access link). . . . I suspect the majority opinion in America is: good." Matt Vespa at TownHall,
What This Swing State Focus Group Said About Trump, Elon, and DOGE Is a Gut Punch for Dems.
LifeZette posts
Karoline Leavitt Crushes Dems’ Fake ‘Constitutional Crisis’ Narrative [WATCH]. Mat Vespa,
Wait, That's How the Judge Who Ruled Against Trump's Foreign Aid Freeze Got Confirmed? Publius @OcrazioCornPop, "
BREAKING: The Senate has confirmed radical left-wing activist Amir H. Ali to serve as a LIFETIME District Judge for the District of Columbia by a narrow vote of 50-49. This confirmation was made possible by the absence of @SenatorBraun (R-IN), who, if present, would have made the vote 50-50. Vice President Kamala Harris, who would typically cast a tie-breaking vote, was in Hawaii and unavailable, so it would have FAILED! . . "
Adrian Vermeule@Vermeullarmine, "
What’s so striking about liberal law professors is that they can’t even understand contrary views, perhaps because of lack of exposure to them. The contrary view is of course that the Constitution itself requires subordinate officers in the Justice Department chain of command to implement the President’s agenda. The oath to the Constitution is an oath to obey that very rule." Quote Barb McQuade @BarbMcQuade, "Here is the oath all executive branch employees take. It is to support and defend the Constitution, not to “implement the president’s agenda.” If the two purposes diverge, the Constitution prevails." So each bureaucrat is his/her/its own Supreme Court? John Lucas at Da Fed maintains
Trump Need Not Bend To The 19-State Lawfare Coup Trying To Thwart His Treasury. Tyler O'Neal at Da Signal looks at the
DEEP STATE ALLIES: Who Are the Leftist Groups Suing to Block Trump’s Reforms?.
Rep. Van Duyne to Newsmax: Dems Embarrassing Themselves Over Elon Musk.
Josh Blackmun at The Volokh Conspiracy sees
"Fools" Rush In the Department of Justice. The fallout continues from the Eric Adams case. "Yesterday, I
wrote about Danielle Sassoon's
resignation, and Emil Bove's
response. Today, Hagan Scotten, another Assistant United States Attorney resigned with a
formal letter. . . . What we have here are two very different conceptions of the federal criminal justice system. On the one hand, Sassoon and her colleagues defend the traditional notion that "independent" prosecutors have the power to define what is in the public good. They can define when public officials abuse their power, and can punish those actions with criminal sanctions. (We saw similar arguments during the first Trump impeachment.) Those defending Sassoon are invested in the DOJ club, and the continuation of its longstanding practices. President Trump, through Bove, articulate a different perspective. The President, as head of the executive branch, can make his own determination of what is in the public good, and determine when public officials are abusing their power. Trump, perhaps more than any living person, is uniquely situated to make this sort of judgment. From the moment he was sworn in, he faced nonstop litigation (remember the Emoluments Clauses?) and two impeachment trials. After he left office, he was indicted in several courts based on novel and dubious theories of criminal liability. Who can forget the efforts to disqualify him under Section 3--which also led to a unanimous Supreme Court reversals? And despite all that happened, Trump still won re-election. Distinguished prosecutors thought they knew what was in the public good. The voters disagreed. There will likely be more resignations. But I think little more is left to be said here. There are two diametrically-opposed views on display. And only one such view can prevail." ET,
Adams Denies Alleged Deal With DOJ to Drop Corruption Case, "The NYC mayor’s statement was in response to a claim in the resignation letter of Danielle Sassoon, the former acting Manhattan U.S. attorney." At NewsMax,
Rep. Raskin Slams DOJ Deal Dropping Adams Corruption Charges. From NYPo,
Top NY Democrat Andrea Stewart-Cousins calls on Mayor Eric Adams to resign.
No comments:
Post a Comment