Nothing really stands out. So, I suppose you've already heard, Trump Indicted For A Third Time (Dana Loesch, cited by the Wombat in In The Mailbox: 08.04.23 (Albuquerque Afternoon Abbreviated Edition). Also via the Wombat, Vox Popoli, Banana Republic USA and Don Surber, Biden Indicts Trump To Hide USA’s Credit Rating Drop.
Herr Professor Jacobsen at LI asks Trump DC Indictment – Where is the crime? "My interview about the Trump DC Indictment: “let’s go on the assumption they think they can prove these things, that the allegations were made in good faith. The question is, is there a crime here? That’s what I think a lot of people are questioning.” Why should we assume good faith here? George Parry at Am Spec calls Trump’s Third Indictment Ludicrous, "The case should be dismissed for failure to state an offense." Matt Vespa at Town Hall points out a WSJ Columnist who Points Out the Obvious Flaw in Jack Smith's J6 Indictment Against Trump "Consider how many politicians might already be doing time had prosecutors applied this standard earlier. Both Al Gore and George W. Bush filed lawsuits in the 2000 election that contained bold if untested legal claims." Town Hall's 'Becca Downs suspects the Special Counsel May Not Have Reviewed Records Before Indicting Trump. "Parlatore said he was "stunned" when, after the indictment came down, the prosecutor contacted him asking for the records he said he had already provided. Parlatore said the "records are absolutely exculpatory."" My extensive experience with the government is that they would rather ask you for the same thing twice than to bother to look in their own records. PJM's Matt Margolis, suggests Jack Smith May Have Doomed His Case Against Trump. "Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team has acknowledged they incorrectly claimed that they had submitted all the necessary evidence as mandated by the law in the classified documents case against Donald Trump. That’s basically a euphemism for getting caught committing prosecutorial misconduct. Prosecutors “discovered” that a crucial video intended to be presented as evidence had not been appropriately processed and uploaded to the designated platform for the defense to review during the investigation." I don't see this judge tossing the case over this ooops. Maybe an appeals court, or the Supremes, if Roberts is looking for a narrow excuse to shit can the whole thing. At the Messenger, Trump Wants to Move His Jan. 6 Trial Out of DC – Here’s Why It Probably Won’t Work "The former president and his lawyers want a venue shift to MAGA-friendly West Virginia." Yeah, that won't happen, but somewhere more neutral, like VA outside the NOVA Democrat lands would fairer. Jim Thompson at Red State has a Prediction: Jack Smith Will Get a DC Jury to Convict Trump and SCOTUS Will Vacate It. In Fact, Smith's Counting on It. At RCP, another prediction, Dershowitz: Conviction Of Trump By DC Jury Will Not Survive Review By Supreme Court. Breitbart cites Mark Levin: Trump’s Lawyers Should Ask SCOTUS to Stop Unconstitutional Prosecutions. Unlikely, but does it hurt to try? PJM's Athena Thorne wonders What if Trump Stops Playing Along? "Make them send armed forces to arrest him like the thugs they are. Show the captivated world that yes, it’s true — America is gone, replaced by just another failing fascist state."
Althouse reads WaPoo, "Former president Donald Trump and some of his legal advisers see an upside to the latest criminal case against him: He can use his upcoming trial to further argue his false claims of a stolen 2020 election...." I'm reading "Trump plans to use charges to revisit 2020 election, a fraught topic for GOP/Strategists in both parties agree that having Trump talking about election fraud and Jan. 6 hurts Republicans" (WaPo). At Am Think Steve Young thinks they are Handing Trump the sword. Neil McCabe at Red State, Trump Lawyer Bobb: Jack Smith's New Indictment Empowers Trump Legal Team to Get J6 Answers. Already, at ET, Trump Subpoenas Unaired Tucker Interview with Ex Capitol Police Chief. YouTube, Trump Attorney EXPOSES Corrupt Justice Department Timeline:Jonathan Turley, calls it Making History in the Wrong Way: The Second Trump Indictment is a Threat to Free Speech. At Da Fed Dave Harsanyi also claims Jack Smith’s Jan 6. Indictments Are An Attack On Political Speech. But Althouse (who also reads the NYT) finds "The strength of the indictment is that it is very narrowly written. The government is not attempting to prove too much, but rather it went for low-hanging fruit." "Said Harvard lawprof and former public defender, quoted in "How Jack Smith Structured the Trump Election Indictment to Reduce Risks/The special counsel layered varied charges atop the same facts, while sidestepping a free-speech question by not charging incitement". At Da Mail, 69% of Republicans now believe Biden's 2020 win was illegitimate: New poll released before Trump's January 6 arraignment shows GOP supporters believe there WAS widespread fraud.
At Fox, Trump judge's greeting to former president sets social media abuzz, Mr. Trump. PM reports Judge threatens to hold Trump without bail if he violates strict conditions of release and Next hearing in Biden DOJ’s Jan 6 case against Trump set for August 28. Sundance at CTH thinks its Seriously Sketchy – Judge Boasberg Sits in Back of DC District Court During President Trump Appearance. From Breitbart, Biden Gloats in ‘Dark Brandon’ Video on the Day Trump Gets Arraigned. Hat Hair paraphrases the Peacock, Putin takes a page from Biden and piles on jail term for political opponent. Irony meter pegged as sundance notes Secretary of State Antony Blinken Condemns Russian President Vladimir Putin for Arresting Political Opposition. Cutie Pavlich at Town Hall, reports How Disgraced IRS Official Lois Lerner is Tied to Trump’s Latest Indictment, she conspired with Jack Smith in the IRS scandal. Matt Vespa is amused when he Reads the Replies: NBC News Reporter Gets Roasted Over Trump Tweet.
"... and counsel to then-FBI Director James B. Comey. Rosenberg served briefly as head of the Drug Enforcement Administration in the Trump administration and notably said the president had 'condoned police misconduct' in remarking to officers in Long Island that they need not protect suspects’ heads when loading them into police vehicles. 'Any federal district judge ought to understand it raises enormous and unprecedented logistical issues,' Rosenberg said of the prospect Trump could be incarcerated. 'Probation, fines, community service and home confinement are all alternatives.'..." From "If Trump is convicted, Secret Service protection may be obstacle to imprisonment/Donald Trump can keep Secret Service protection for life, even if he were to be convicted and sentenced to prison or home confinement" (WaPo).
Insty, EVERY INSTITUTION HAS BEEN CORRUPTED:
Jude Russo at Town Hall simply says Trump Won, "It’s not a story you’ll see in the papers."With yet another Trump indictment apparently coming soon from a left wing DA in Georgia, it seems worth reminding everyone that this individual was the foreperson on that grand jury
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) August 4, 2023
pic.twitter.com/Vn2fz3jOyR
No comments:
Post a Comment