New Email Troubles at Clinton.com

Judicial Watch just released 44 new Hillary Clinton emails that were not among the 30,000 emails that she turned over to the State Dept., presumably among the 30,000 that her lawyers deemed personal and deleted. These emails were located by searching the emails in Huma Abedin's stash (hint, when destroying digital evidence, get it all). As we all expected, some of these emails were more significant than Chelsea's wedding plans and yoga routines, confirming our suspicion that they likely involved "pay to play" contributions to the Clinton crime syndicate. For example, in one email, State asked to ‘take care of’ Clinton Foundation associate

Shortly after Hillary Clinton took the reins as U.S. secretary of State in 2009, a longtime confidante with deep ties to the Clinton Foundation pressed her senior aides to give a job to an unidentified male associate.

“Important to take care of” the person, Douglas Band told Clinton aides Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and Nora Toiv in an April 22, 2009, email with the subject line “A favor…”. The name of the aide is redacted.

“We have all had him on our radar,” Abedin responded. “Personnel has been sending him options.”

The emails also reveal  HILLARY AIDE OKAYED ABU DHABI DEAL THAT PAID BILL $500,000 FOR A SPEECH. How Cozy!

Cheryl Mills, Hillary’s Chief of Staff, okayed the deal in private discussions with Clinton Foundation officials while her boss was in Bangladesh publicly defending another Clinton Foundation donor who was in hot water in that country over questionable accounting of government funds. And so on and so on and so on and …..

They also showed Huma scheming for Hillary

In an April 2009 email to Clinton’s State Department aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, President Clinton’s former body man, Doug Band, the founder of corporate consultant Teneo, urgently asked them to set up a meeting with an ambassador for a major donor to the Clinton Foundation.

“We need Gilbert Chagoury to speak to the substance person re lebanon. As you know, he’s key guy there and to us and is loved in lebanon.”

We also found out that the FBI probe of Clinton's emails prompted by espionage fears. What? Not a

Two secret letters the FBI sent to the State Department have revealed for the first time that the bureau's investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server, and the classified emails sent through it, stemmed from a so-called "Section 811" referral from the Intelligence Community's Inspector General (ICIG). The ICIG determined that classified, national security information in Clinton's emails may have been "compromised" and shared with "a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power."

The RNC has opened an new front in the investigation of Clinton emails New Clinton email fight: Bill Clinton's schedules An RNC lawsuit is trying to force release of the records, but it may not gain traction before the election.

"The record ... reflects that State Department officials and Clinton Foundation officials worked essentially hand in glove, coordinating President Clinton’s schedule and whom he would speak with, as well as talking points and even briefings with regard to political ramifications of certain meetings or events," wrote Jason Torchinsky, an attorney for the RNC. "The electronic calendar records at issue here merely are a function of, and inextricably intertwined with, that coordinated effort with the federal agency officials."

Fresh today, another release by Judicial Watch suggests the Cheryl Mills memory about the FOIA requests was conveniently lacking. Short-Circuit Damage to US Security: Hillary’s Lies and Amiri’s Execution

Benghazi victims’ families file suit against Clinton, claiming that her sloppy email habits led to security leaks that got their sons killed. I doubt it will go anywhere, but right cannot let the left continue to fight using lawfare without any response.

All of which has Howard Dean screaming ‘What more do you want?’ while defending Hillary’s email lies. I, for one, would like her to stop lying.

Wikileaks: Huma Abedin Had Access To, and Used, the Hillary Clinton Email Address By Which She Received and Sent Classified Information "Was Huma Abedin "read into" the "read-into-only" compartmentalized classified information Hillary had on her servers?" Of course, you don't really expect the queen to soil her fingers with such trifling tasks as national security when the more important Clinton crime family business needs husbanding wifing? The exiled head of Wikileaks, Julian Assange is insinuating that its was a DNC leak and not a Russian leak, and that the DNC had the leaker, one Seth Rich, killed. I'd hate to think our politics have gotten that low.

Another major story yesterday was that the Father of Orlando Nightclub Shooter Omar Mateen Appears At Hillary Rally, Seated Right Behind Her. It would be one thing if he were moderate Muslim, but he supports the Taliban, and the idea that gays should be killed. What where they thinking? Well, his son was a Hillary supporter too. Instapundit shouts “NOW LET’S PRETEND MATEEN WAS A REPUBLICAN AND HIS FATHER SHOWED UP AT A TRUMP RALLY. YOU KNOW HOW THAT WOULD GO.” Or Dylan Roofs parents? Survivor 'outraged' at Omar Mateen's father attending event. Ann Althouse asks Does it mean anything that the father of Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter, showed up at Hillary's Orlando rally? The fun, as usual, is in the comments:

My name goes here. said... It means that people that make anti-American videos, and/or support the taliban, and/or support run for the office of President of Afghanistan, and/or are under investigation by the FBI, and/or blame the pulse nightclub for the shooting that occurred in that nightclub have a political party they think is in alignment with them.

Why, maybe that explains why Bill Clinton Received $5.6 Million from World’s Largest Sharia Law Education Firm. Instapundit asks: Are they both trying to lose the White House? Trump runs amok while Clinton accidentally hangs out with a terrorist's dad.

It's been a couple of big days over at Wombat-socho's "In the Mailbox" from 08.08.16,   Robot Hillary “Short Circuits”, Benghazi Parents File Wrongful Death, Defamation Suits Against Hillary,  Iran Executes Nuke Scientist Who Hillary Discussed On Her Home-Brewed, Unsecured Server, Panic in Camp Hillary, Hillary’s Former Employer, LeFarge, Faces Charges Of Funding ISIS, and from 08.09.16, Ready For Hillary – DNC Invites Orlando Shooter’s Father To Attend Clinton Rally, Ben Shapiro – Hey Media, Does Hillary Disavow Mateen?, Chronic Truth Aversion Disorder, This Election Could Wipe Out Democrats, Hillary’s Medical Records Revealed – THIS Is What She’s Hiding

FBI RAIDS (former) Hillary Campaign Headquarters, Here’s What We Know…

During the Democratic National Convention, the office of Philadelphia’s most powerful construction union served as a headquarters for Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and just a week later it was raided by federal agents.

According to a report from Heat Street, authorities raided the office of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98, but they didn’t stop there. The union’s powerful boss, John “Johnny Doc” Dougherty, who also heads the Philadelphia Building and Construction Trades Council, also had his home and a pub he runs raided by federal agents.

Video uploaded to Facebook appears to show a yellow Penske truck being loaded with computers, filing cabinets, boxes of documents, and even the printers inside of the building.

More likely having to do with union crime than Clinton crime, but you never know what might show up. Grand Jury Investigating Powerful, Clinton-Supporting Union for Allegedly Threatening Foes

CLINTON VS. TRUMP TAX PLANS: The Differences to Your Wallet Will Blow Your Mind

Clinton wants to increase taxes on individuals, specifically wealthy Americans, and businesses. She also proposes a significant change to the capital gains tax and wants to expand the estate tax, according to analysis by the Tax Foundation.

Trump wants to abolish the estate tax and wants an income tax reduction that encompasses most American families.

Ann Althouse wonders Will Hillary Clinton skip the debates? I've been suspecting it all along. She'll just say something about how "extreme" he is, and try to stay under her invisibility cloak.

Hillary's health scrutiny continues. Is This Hillary Clinton’s “Medical Handler”?… The guy who carries the diazapam injector for seizure emergencies? Law Enforcement Officials, Medical Professionals: There’s Something Seriously Wrong With Hillary Clinton’s Health. I remember a lot of ink being spilled because of John McCain's bout with cancer. Kathy Shaidle looks at her Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and concludes:

As a female INTJ, she’d be so much happier living in a lighthouse than in the White House. Wouldn’t it be great for America’s future if only she admitted that, too?

The Hill newspaper is being accused of Hillary favoritism after it used a fake photoshopped crowd to promote a live video stream of Clinton’s rally in St. Petersburg. She can't just elect herself, after all, as much as she'd like to.

Child rape victim comes forward for the first time in 40 years to call Hillary Clinton a 'liar' who defended her rapist by smearing her, blocking evidence and callously laughing that she knew he was guilty

Shelton said Clinton accused her during the case of 'seeking out older men', and demanded that the 12-year-old undergo a grueling court-ordered psychiatric examination to determine whether she was 'mentally unstable'.

'I don't think [Clinton's] for women or girls. I think she's lying, I think she said anything she can to get in the campaign and win,' Shelton said. 'If she was [an advocate for women and children], she wouldn't have done that to me at 12 years old.'

While Shelton gave an anonymous interview to the Daily Beast in 2014, she said wants to start speaking out publicly, in part because 'I think a lot of people would look at [Clinton] in a different way' after hearing her story directly.

Will Hillary and her crowd give her the same respect they gave the Benghazi moms? Read on. It's pretty bad.

The rapists lured the girl -- I guess she was "seeking out older men" -- into a van, then raped her so badly she needed to get stitches in her vagina.

She cannot bear children due to the attack.

In related news, Trump punched a baby in the dick. Then he said something about guns and judges. It's just terrible. I just can't even.

Democrats for Denying Due Process

Immediately after the horror show in Orlando, the call went out from the usual suspects to do something about controlling guns. The first thing that came to mind, when it was shortly thereafter discovered that Omar Mateen, a second generation American citizen, a registered Democrat, a Hillary supporter, and quite likely a gay man had been investigated at least twice by the FBI for terrorist connections and cleared, was to propose to ban anyone, including American citizens on the terror watch list or the no fly list, or any of the various lists the government keeps on all of us, from buying guns. Never mind it wouldn't have stopped Mateen, he had passed his checks and was no longer on any such list.

There's only one thing between the Democrats and doing this, and that's the Due Process clauses of the 5th and 14th amendments:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

As Joe Manchin (D- WV) noted:

 The latest attempt has been incredibly direct, with Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., declaring that "due process is what's killing us right now."

Manchin's comments came in response to the Orlando terrorist attack that killed 49 people and injured 53 more. Speaking on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," Manchin said that due process was keeping legislators from banning those on the Terrorist Watch List from purchasing guns.

"The problem we have, and really the firewall we have right now, is due process," Manchin said Thursday. "It's all due process."

Darn that pesky due process and its constitutional protections!

Charles Cooke catches Harry Reid in flagrante: Guns and the no-fly list: Whatever happened to due process?

When Reid and his accomplices argue that nobody on the “terror watch list” should be permitted to buy a gun, they are saying in effect that the government should have the power to deprive you of your enumerated constitutional rights purely by entering your name into a database.

This is unacceptable. Even if the “terror watch list” were transparent and well-regulated, there would be serious philosophical problems with such an arrangement. But for the government to propose using a system that is as opaque, as messy, and as downright bloated as is this one . . . frankly, it beggars belief.

Yes, the pesky 2nd amendment gives US citizen the liberty, the right as it were, to keep and bear arms, which isn't much good without the means to buy them.

And just what do we mean by due process, which is not, itself, clearly defined in the constitution (apparently it was considered too basic to explain; a certain naivete on the founders part)?

The article "Some Kind of Hearing" written by Judge Henry Friendly created a list of basic due process rights "that remains highly influential, as to both content and relative priority." These rights, which apply equally to civil due process and criminal due process, are:

1. An unbiased tribunal.
2. Notice of the proposed action and the grounds asserted for it.
3. Opportunity to present reasons why the proposed action should not be taken.
4. The right to present evidence, including the right to call witnesses.
5. The right to know opposing evidence.
6. The right to cross-examine adverse witnesses.
7. A decision based exclusively on the evidence presented.
8. Opportunity to be represented by counsel.
9. Requirement that the tribunal prepare a record of the evidence presented.
10. Requirement that the tribunal prepare written findings of fact and reasons for its decision.

Now, consider how one gets on the terror watch list, or the no fly list. Are any of these tests met? No. A government bureaucrat, at the request of, who knows? makes a determination that you may be a dangerous person, and your name is added to the list. No tribunal, no notice, no chance to rebut, no chance to see evidence, no right of cross examination, no right of counsel, no public record, and no findings. And it might just be a name you share with some other person. This was amusing when Ted Kennedy found he was on the no fly list. It took a US Senator 3 weeks to get that cleared up. But what about the 8 year old Cub Scout flagged for the no fly list? His parents don't have the pull of US Senator.

Donald Trump, in his usually inclusive, sloppy style, has been all over both sides of the issue: I’d like to see people on terror watch lists barred from buying guns, but…

He’s aware of the due-process issue, as you’ll see, but he’s cagey about how committed he is to it. Would he veto a Democratic bill that let the Justice Department summarily strip watch-listers of their gun rights or would he sign it while mumbling half-heartedly that he would have preferred legislation with some right to appeal built in? As usual when he’s outside his build-the-wall/bar-the-Muslims comfort zone, he won’t say clearly what he intends to do.

“We have to make sure that people that are terrorists or have even an inclination toward terrorism cannot buy weapons, guns,” Trump told ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl in an interview to air Sunday on “This Week.”
Asked by Karl if his position is that those on the no-fly or terror watch list should not be able to purchase a gun, Trump responded, “I’d like to see that, and I’d like to say it. And it’s simpler. It’s just simpler.”…
“Now, but what they say, and I understand that also, is the Second Amendment, they’re depriving them of those rights. And that it could be that people are on there that shouldn’t be on, you know, etc. etc.,” Trump said.
“I’ll talk to them,” Trump added. “I understand exactly what they’re saying. You know, a lot of people are on the list that that really maybe shouldn’t be on the list and you know their rights are being taken away so I understand that.”

He understands the due-process objection but so do a lot of Democrats, I’m sure, who’d nonetheless prefer to give the DOJ the final say here. I think he’s destined to adopt the GOP/NRA position for the simple reason that he can’t afford any more turmoil on the right at this point.

Republicans gave Democrats a chance to put a gun buying ban on the terror watch list with due process protections added, and predictably the Democrats preferred an issue to a solution: Democrats Tanked Gun Control To Up Their Election Chances

Senate Republicans agreed to vote on four gun control proposals—two offered by Democrats and two offered by Republicans. The Democratic proposals included Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s bill linking a terrorism watch list to a gun sales ban. On the Republican side, Sen. John Cornyn also offered legislation that would link a terrorism watch list to a gun sales ban, but his version added due process protections for Americans who are put on the list. The other two proposals expanded the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, although the Republican version did not go as far as the Democratic version. For a brief moment it seemed as if the Senate would take some kind of action.

Then all four gun control proposals were voted down because of the Democrats.

Rather than agree to the incremental gun control measures Republicans proposed, the Democrats chose to pass no gun control legislation at all. At some point after loudly demanding legislation for more than a week, Senate Democrats decided it would be better for their reelection prospects that no gun control bills pass the Senate during the election season. Their decision was hypocritical, unprincipled, and pure politics.

At this point, I would believe that no fly list is a violation of the due process, denying you the liberty to fly on a commercial carrier, with no adjudication, presentation of evidence, opportunity to rebut, etc. If they want to put US citizens on a list to deny their rights, at least go through the proper motions.

Anger Management at Clinton.com

And she wants to control the nuclear football: Secret Service Agent Book: Raging Hillary Clinton Threw Bible at Agent’s Colleague Maybe anger management sessions should be part of her sentence in the private email server case.

Speaking of anger management, a 19 year old British Hillary supporter, (or was he a Bernie Bro?), tried to take a gun away from a security guard at a Las Vegas Trump rally to assassinate Donald Trump. Maybe Donald should amend his plan to exclude British tourists until we can figure out how to properly vet them.

A fellow St. Lucie, Florida Muslim reports that the Orlando killer, Omar Mateen, was a Hillary supporter, too.

. . . Omar and I continued to have infrequent conversations over the next few years. I last saw him at a dinner at his father’s house in January. We talked about the presidential election and debated our views of the candidates that were running – he liked Hillary Clinton and I liked Bernie Sanders. This banter continued through texts and phone calls for several months.

Hillary AND ISIS. The man was evil.

Guccifer 2.0 strikes again: Leaked Guide Shows Clinton Staffers how to Solicit for Super Pac without Breaking Pesky Rules

The memo, found among the trove of documents from the Democratic National Committee apparently stolen by the hacker who goes by the name Guccifer 2.0, includes rules and sample statements that will keep you on the right side of America’s barely existing campaign finance laws.

All the rules quoted below are taken directly from that memo. The sample statements are an artistic extrapolation.

Rule: “All conversations that refer to a Preferred Super PAC should include a hard ask for $5,000.”
Statement: “The law allows us to ask our supporters to give $5,000 to the Priorities USA Super PAC. I legally cannot ask you to give more than that, even though, given your enormous fortune, you could easily afford it. You are very handsome and/or pretty.”

Rule: “Do not specifically earmark the funds for [Hillary Clinton]’s election.”
Statement: “We do not control how Priorities USA spends its money. Anything is possible! Anything at all! All the people making the decisions have been employed by Bill and Hillary Clinton since 1995.”

I'm opposed to campaign finance restrictions in general, but if they exist, they must be enforced evenly on all sides.

A lie even Glenn Kessler couldn't stomach? Another claim of a Hillary Clinton “accomplishment” goes up in flames

While most of her surrogates begin stammering and attempting to change the subject when questions of specifically what those accomplishments might be comes up, Clinton herself has no trouble listing them as part of her campaign portfolio. This past week they put out yet another campaign ad touting one of her many victories on behalf of America’s children. Did you know that she was instrumental in creating the Children’s Health Insurance Program in 1998?

What’s that you say? She wasn’t even in any elected office in 1998 and couldn’t possibly have enacted any legislation or signed a bill into law? She’s not going to let a little thing like that bother her.

But as usual, when considering a lie from the left, Kessler manages to weasel it down to only two Pinocchios.

A bumper crop from Larwyn's Linx 06/20: 10 More Examples of Google Gaming Search Results to Benefit Hillary Clinton, AG Lynch: I've Never Discussed Hillary Email Probe With Obama, Hillary faces serious, even legal, potholes on road to presidency, Hillary, DNC conspired to engineer media blackout of Bernie Sanders, Forget Party Unity: New DNC Email Leak Means No Going Back For Sanders’ Democrats.

Wombat-socho's "In the Mailbox, 06.20.16" has nothing, zip, zero, nada about Hillary. But you should scan it anyway, if only for the usually sensible Megan McArdle's "Game of Thrones" spoilers. Nah, really, there's a bunch of good stuff there, just not any Hillary.

TV News Feasts on Trump Controversies While Ignoring Hillary’s Scandals That's because they're all just Democrat Party hacks with bylines.

Swing State Polls Show Close Race Between Clinton, Trump

Traditional swing states show a battle similar to the fight in 2012 between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, with one exception. The emergence of Pennsylvania as a toss-up contest has already shifted the landscape ahead of November.

On Thursday, Democrat-leaning firm PPP released a poll of Virginia voters showing Clinton leading Trump by 3 points in the Old Dominion. Last year, PPP showed Clinton leading Trump by 10 points in Virginia. Since then, Clinton’s favorablity has decreased, while Trump’s has improved.

Could the Bradley Effect be playing a role?

The Bradley effect posits that the inaccurate polls were skewed by the phenomenon of social desirability bias. Specifically, some white voters give inaccurate polling responses for fear that, by stating their true preference, they will open themselves to criticism of racial motivation. Members of the public may feel under pressure to provide an answer that is deemed to be more publicly acceptable, or 'politically correct'. The reluctance to give accurate polling answers has sometimes extended to post-election exit polls as well. The race of the pollster conducting the interview may factor into voters' answers.

Trump is orange, after all. 

Trump Loses His Head Over Clinton.com

Not a huge harvest today. A tid-bit from Judicial Watch on Cheryl Mills deposition: Mills won't even vouch for her own honesty:

CAN’T RECALL — “Mull answered questions for more than 3 hours Friday at a deposition attended by eight lawyers for the government and Judicial Watch, days after deposition appearances by former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and Lewis A. Lukens, a former administrative official.

Mull said he not recall the communication, or the circumstances behind it.

‘So you don’t recall why you wrote this sentence?’ Judicial Watch lawyer Michael Bekesha asked.

‘Today I don’t, no,’ Mull said.”…http://wapo.st/1Pf9xdY

Hillary’s aide is so evasive that she can’t even clearly vouch for her own honesty — “She can’t, or won’t, make a direct statement even about her own honesty. “Are there any reasons why you would not be able to answer truthfully here today?” asks the Judicial Watch attorney. “Not that I know of,” Ms. Mills responds, suggesting that there may be reasons she’s lying, but that she probably won’t recall them until later.”… http://on.wsj.com/1U1jsJL

Yes, Virginia Hillary, the FBI’s Investigation Is Criminal. But she's done an excellent job of persuading the democrat hacks with press cards to portray it otherwise. God know they wouldn't have thought it up by themselves. Instapundit hits a double with this tweet:

So What Difference Does It Make?

Do you know why Donald Trump is defying the odds, defying the predictions of doom and defeat? Yes, by the time this runs, the people gleefully thinking that the tempest in the margarita glass that is the whole Trump U judge thing will FINALLY BRING DONALD DOWN! are going to realize, once again, that nothing matters.

No one cares. LOL.

Someone else came up with the “Nothing matters. LOL” formulation to describe this election year, and he deserves a nice shiny quarter, unless he is a Hillary Clinton fan in which case someone should smack him for supporting that cancer on our Constitution.
. . .
Hillary’s formulation of “Nothing matters, no one cares” is just a little different. For her, it’s “What difference, at this point, does it make?” You know, that comment she made when some congressmen – not including any Democrats – tried to hold her to account for getting four Americans killed and lying to not only their families’ faces but to our faces about it.

And the people who aren’t in Hillary’s trick bag are supposed to care that Trump’s a jerk?
 . . .
Is sexual assault bad only when President Pantsuit’s nominal hubby isn’t the one committing it?

Are we still doing the rule of law? Anyone who spent 15 minutes in uniform – including a Cub Scout uniform – knows that if 5% of what’s been reported that Hillary Clinton did with classified info is true, anyone else would be in Leavenworth making intimate new friends. But to liberals, no biggie. What’s a few felonies involving national security between progressives?

Yet a bunch of suckers voluntarily paid some school Donald Trump licensed his name to and we’re supposed to lose our minds? Gotta say though, many of us are just not feeing the care. We can’t muster up the energy to enforce rules that no longer exist. We have learned that all that matters is winning, that the only truth is power. Beyond that, nothing matters, no one cares. LOL. . . 

And now the recriminations from Orlando: Hillary: Hate is not the answer to “people who themselves are divided in their loyalties and their beliefs”

Good catch by Karol Markowicz. Who are the people Hillary has in mind at the end here when she refers to divided loyalties? I don’t think she means jihadis. Their loyalties aren’t divided, and even a Democrat would say it’s okay to hate ISIS, I hope. Is she talking about … Muslims generally? Because that’d be a seven-alarm media fire if Trump said it. It doesn’t sound like a calculated talking point either; it sounds like a slip, something she said just because that’s where her train of thought took her. Although with Hillary, you never know. Would a woman who once subtly cast doubt on whether Barack Obama is a Christian and presented herself as beingadamantly against illegal immigrants casually question the patriotism of American Muslims if she thought it might earn her a second look from more right-leaning voters? Er, why not?

Will she, won't she? Only the polls know.  Clinton explains why she won't say 'radical Islam'. Hillary Evolves, Now Willing to Cite 'Radical Islam' as Problem. Hillary Clinton Utters the Forbidden Words for Progressives. Sort of. Now will you vote for her? In Wake of Orlando Shooting, Clinton Tacks to the Center on Terror 

Stop telling me to get excited about Hillary Clinton. No problem!

Clinton’s Opponent In Her 2000 Senate Race Made An Ominous Prediction About Her Character

“What’s so troubling here with respect to what my opponent just said, is somehow that it only matters what you say when you get caught. And character and trust is about well more than that. And blaming others every time you have responsibility? Unfortunately that’s become a pattern, I think, for my opponent.”

And Donald Trump supporters need to be more civil to Hillary, don't you think? Hillary-supporting website selling severed Trump head T-shirts

Feel like Election 2016 could use a bit more incivility? Well, then, we’ve got the T-shirt for you!

For a mere $27.68 a pop, the overtly pro-Hillary website Wonkette is peddling anti-Trump apparel, complete with Clinton holding The Donald’s severed head.

Luckily, there’s a historical reference to hide behind here, the story of Judith and Holofernes. Whether that will keep the Secret Service at bay is anyone’s guess.

I'm sure the Secret Service will be all up in Wonkette's ass about this.

Lovingly designed at Wonkette’s Missoula, Montana fashion studios, there’s no word on how many have sold since it became available a few days ago. Should they run out, however, there are plenty of other items on offer, including “Truck Fump” notebooks, mugs, pillows and of course, T-shirts.

 But it's only bad when Republicans do it.