So, at this point, the question remains, what was the FBI looking for at
Mar-a-Lago (or, what did they need to plant, and then "find")? Of course, the
ostensible reason is "classified documents); Joe Cunninghang at Red
State, Startling New Report Indicates FBI Was Looking for Extremely Sensitive
Documents at Trump's Mar-a-Lago. Leading theorists think that while the "classified material" are what they
were looking for, their real goal was to find something to link Trump the Jan.
6 directly. Kylee Griswold at Da Fed has a list of 20 Things The Feds Probably Planted In The Boxes They Took From Trump’s
House. "4. An Inscription in a 2021 Playboy Calendar. It’s the only marking in the
otherwise crisp planner. On the little square for Jan. 6, it reads, “Remember
to do insurrection.”" A hypothesis cropped up yesterday, like mice in moldy
rags, was that they were looking for some kind of nuclear weapons secret.
Sundance at CTH, Watch for Falling Anvils,
The Washington Post Claims FBI Raid Was Looking for Super-Secret Nuclear
Intel in Mar-a-Lago. Reform Club, Rationale or Pretext? Sundance has, as usual, a long discourse on the reasons for the
raid, Why Did the DOJ and FBI Execute the Raid on Trump,
Part 1,
Part 2,
Part 3
and
Part 4. At the risk of leaving out something important, his theory boils down to
the notion that Donald Trump carried out material pertaining to the Russiagate
origin, that would be deeply damaging to the intelligence committee. He
attempted to declassify it prior to leaving office, but Bill Barr, and the
intelligence community refused to go along. The raid was an attempt to get
that information back, and make it impossible for Trump to use it (basically
as blackmail material). I'm kind of leaning in that direction.
The NYT, cited by Haut Hair, claims Trump allies warn senior Republicans against criticizing the FBI "Some senior Republicans have been warned by allies of Mr. Trump not to
continue to be aggressive in criticizing the Justice Department and the F.B.I.
over the matter because it is possible that more damaging information related
to the search will become public." Also, 'Bonchie' reports
FBI Dir. Christopher Wray Finally Responds to Raid of Trump Residence. He say 'Don't blame us, we're just being good
Germans soldiers'. He should be more careful with the word
"deplorable"
🚨Breaking: FBI Director Chris Wray finally confronted on FBI raid of Donald
Trump’s private residence at Mar-A-Lago, deflects and says he’s “concerned”
about “threats” being made to FBI agents after they ransacked the former
President’s home.
pic.twitter.com/VXC6XnQpxp
Crossed the Rubicon, "This week we see the continued weaponization of the federal government
against the American people. Is there any turning back now?" Deroy Murdock at
Am Spec notes the
FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago Reeks of Secret-Police Tyranny, "We now have a two-track justice system: impunity for Democrats and
persecution for Republicans." Michele Malkin at CNS News, FBI: Feds Behaving Incorrigibly. Via the
Wombat's In The Mailbox: 08.11.22, At Am Great, Kylee Shidler says
For the Rule of Law to Reign, the Bureau Must Be Destroyed. "The FBI cannot be saved. It must be rendered into component parts and
distributed to the four winds." Ace
elaborates on that thought. "'If you are allowed to launch coup after coup against the duly elected
President that the people of the United States fairly and freely elected, then
it's not a coup. It's now just Part of How the System Works." Also at Am
Great the great Victor Davis Hanson,
FBI, R.I.P.?
"The agency has become dangerous to Americans and an existential threat to
their democracy and rule of law. " JB Shurk at Am Think thinks The Federal Government Refuses to Listen. They listen and what they hear has them scared.
Also from the Wombat's In The Mailbox: 08.11.22, Victory Girls:
Judge Reinhart Recused Self from Trump-Clinton Suit. One of the reasons I suspect Garland may not have been linked in ahead of
the raid is the choice of Reinhart as the magistrate signing the warrant. It's
pretty clear they went judge shopping and hit the bottom of the barrel before
they found one to go along.
“First of all, to all my friends in Wyoming and around the country, let me
assure you I made peace with this moment long ago. This is not the result we
wanted, but it is a victory — for everyone who believes that standing up for
what’s right, for the Constitution, for the future of our democracy is more
important than clinging to power or holding some fancy title. This fight is
not over — it may take many years. For anyone wondering about my own future,
let me say this: I will do everything in my power to make sure Donald Trump
is never again near the Oval Office.”
What she means is something
like this:
I still can’t believe that people in Wyoming — tough,
stoical no-BS people — would turn their back on a Cheney in favor of such an
obvious fraud. So, no, I’m not exactly at peace. But, yes, I saw this coming
17 months ago and once I started down the path of confronting Trump there
was no turning back. Why do you think I left so much of the money gushing to
me from Dems and Never Trumpers unspent in this primary — it’s the war chest
that will keep me relevant on the national stage. No, I won’t ever be
Speaker of the House. But no need to be too coy about it: I do plan to run
for president. I’ve already dropped plenty of breadcrumbs, like that
ABC interview
last month when I hardly denied my interest, and I’ll soon be dropping more.
Does that mean a “kamikaze run” against Trump in 2024? Or a declaration that
the Republican Party for now is beyond saving, and therefore I’m leading a
third-party movement? Standby — still working on my options.
No comments:
Post a Comment