At least that's what the Democrats are trying to sell you. WaPoo, House Democrats building elaborate, emotionally charged case against
Trump.
"If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you,
argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table
and yell like hell". So this makes it pretty clear, as if we needed any more evidence, that the
"impeachment 2.0" is not designed to change Senators minds. Senators are
lizard people, they have no emotions. Rather it's aimed to sully Donald Trump
and Republicans in the public, particularly women who are more
susceptible to the emotional. A strategey so obvious that even Andy McCarthy
at NR can see it, Democrats Are Laying a Trap with Trump’s Impeachment Trial "Democrats' Impeachment Strategy to Hurt Republicans". Based on this
all Republicans ought to simply refuse to participate, and vote no when the
Dems get tired of hearing themselves. But of course, there's always a few who
fall for the trick. Insty has the quote: ADMIRAL ACKBAR, CALL YOUR OFFICE:
Democrats Are Laying a Trap with Trump’s Impeachment Trial.
Democrats do not want to disqualify Trump. They want to keep him
radioactive. They want to remind the country in lurid detail of the former
president’s role in the lethal January 6 rioting — the demagogic speech, the
failure to take action while the seat of government was under siege. And
then they want to force a vote — conviction or acquittal — that will be
framed as every GOP senator’s choice to stand with Trump or against him.
How
do Democrats want Republicans to vote? No matter . . . it’s a win-win.
Read the whole thing.
I would, but I ran out of free views (even though I'm still sponging off the
nearly lifetime subscription to paper NR that my Mom accidentally paid for
years ago).
CNN, Trump's impeachment defense team leaves less than two weeks before trial
Butch Bowers
and
Deborah Barbier, who were expected to be two of the lead attorneys, are no longer on the
team. A source familiar with the changes said it was a mutual decision for
both to leave the legal team. As the lead attorney, Bowers assembled the
team.
Josh Howard, a North Carolina attorney who was recently added
to the team, has also left, according to another source familiar with the
changes. Johnny Gasser and Greg Harris, from South Carolina, are no longer
involved with the case, either.
A person familiar with the departures told CNN that Trump wanted the attorneys
to argue there was mass election fraud and that the election was stolen from
him rather than focus on the legality of convicting a president after he's
left office. Trump was not receptive to the discussions about how they should
proceed in that regard.
Do lawyers really matter in this trial? The conclusion is foregone; why waste
the money? Althouse faces the prospect with equanimity,
Is Trump pathetically lawyerless or is he planning the power move of all
time — representing himself on the Senate floor?
The conventional wisdom is, of course, that you never want to represent
yourself — but that's in reference to the conventional setting, where you are
in court and it's a law-based affair. Trump faces a trial in the midst of 100
Senators, with no Chief Justice presiding — no separate decision-makers of law
and fact — and a complete tangle of law and politics, with politics taking
precedence over law.
Think about the stakes: What does Trump risk
if he loses? Disqualification from running for office again? The real stakes
are history — who writes it and whether Trump, in this next chapter, is a
has-been holed up in Florida or the biggest, ballsiest man in American
history, fighting 100 pompous politicos on the floor of the Senate. What a
wildly entertaining movie! You say he's a narcissist? A reality-show star who
somehow burst into the highest level of politics, where he boldly, recklessly
proceeds on instinct and optimism?
Also Althouse, "Let’s get one thing straight: there’s nothing 'respectable' about
representing Donald Trump in his impeachment trial. Trump doesn’t have any
legal right..."
"... to be represented by a lawyer in this context: it’s not a criminal
trial, and if no real lawyer is willing to represent him, well that’s just
too bad. The notion that someone like Trump has a 'right' to have lawyers
help him out in this context is a particularly perverse abuse of the concept
of the right to counsel. If you represent Trump in this context it’s either
because you think what Trump did on January 6th was affirmatively good, or
you like money — or more realistically the promise of money — enough to
overcome your distaste for murderous sedition."
Writes lawprof Paul Campos, (at Lawyer, Guns & Money). He finds it "funny" that Trump's "entire
legal team quits. He's laughing at Trump's loss of legal representation and
condemning any lawyer who would step up to provide representation. He says
it's perverse and abusive even to think that there is a right to counsel at
this thing called a trial that is to take place in the Senate. Everyone
already knows in advance that Trump is guilty of "murderous sedition."
It's
very creepy, this aggressive enthusiasm for seeing one's enemy deprived of a
defense.
It's a show trial, after all, no need for a defense. Jonathon Turley,
Why Hasn’t The House Held Hearings To Establish “Incitement To
Insurrection”? Because they know the facts aren't on their side. Neither is the law,
so they want to yell and pound the table.
Carrie Sheffield at JTN writes
Growing evidence Capitol assault was planned weakens incitement case
against Trump, experts say "
If Trump "didn't know about it, they had planned it without him, then you're
missing the causal relationship," said Alan Dershowitz. "It would have
happened without his speech as well. So that would be relevant on the issue of
causation."
WSH whines, Jan. 6 Rally Funded by Top Trump Donor, Helped by Alex Jones, Organizers
Say. Trump donors helped Trump, journolists offended. Sundance recounts
how Justice Department Charges Proud Boys With Conspiracy To Obstruct Law
Enforcement. The DOJ/FBI have gone all in on the right-wing extremist threats. Where
were they when BLM burned the cities this summer? Proud Boys = Immanuel
Goldstein.
WaPoo whines Woman charged in Capitol riot said she wanted to shoot Pelosi ‘in the
friggin’ brain,' FBI says. People say a lot of shit they don't mean. Let me know when
Kathy Griffin
gets done with her sentence for inciting violence against Trump. Fresh via
Insty, Colleges investigate community members for attending pro-Trump protest "THE CRUSHING OF DISSENT WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES."
At Da Fed, Kristi Noem writes The Republican Party Has Failed America, And Here’s How It Needs To Change
Now
In 2020, despite the virus, if you wanted to riot, loot, and burn buildings
down, the government either stood idly by while you did that, or worse,
tacitly encouraged the destruction.
Government didn’t punish the
violent criminals. But it did everything it could to punish those Americans
who simply tried to defend themselves, their families, their livelihoods, and
their property.
What we lived in 2020 is the left’s vision for
America.
So now we know what the other side stands for. What is it
that Republicans stand for?
We stand for the rule of law, not
selective prosecution based on what your political views are. We stand for the
right to defend yourself, your family, and your property. For your right to
worship, to actually practice and live your faith according to your
conscience.
We stand for your right to earn a living and to do
business.
I could vote for her. And to switch subjects again, from WaEx, 'Expert witness list' released in Antrim County lawsuit involving Dominion
voting machines
An "expert witness list" was filed in court after a Michigan judge ruled
that the names of the so-called “forensic investigators” who filed a report
about Dominion Voting Systems machines in Antrim County could be
released.
The court document was filed by the
plaintiff’s attorney in the lawsuit, Matthew DePerno, and includes five
names along with a description about what each person is expected to
testify. Included are Russell Ramsland, James Wadron, and Doug Logan. Also
on the list are Greg Feemyer and Paul Maggio of Atlanta-based data security
company Sullivan Strickler.
Other witnesses
include attorney Katherine Friess, C. James Hayes, and Todd Sanders,
according to the Traverse City Record-Eagle, which cited a document from the
Michigan attorney general’s office. Despite the release, it is not clear
what role each of the witnesses might have played in the “forensic”
investigation of the voting machines, which yielded a report that Dominion
CEO John Poulos blasted as “technically incomprehensible.”
“What
role each one played in the preparation of the report, my understanding is
we won’t know until these individuals are deposed,” said Haider Kazim, the
attorney representing Antrim County.
It's good to see progress toward untangling the mess, how ever incremental.